Test helps identify mums at risk of type 2 after GDM
Wednesday, 27 May 2020
This discovery could lead to a test that helps doctors identify women at greatest risk of developing type 2 diabetes and help them potentially avert the condition through interventions including diet and exercise.
Michael Wheeler, Senior scientist at Toronto General Hospital Institute said, “There is a metabolic dysregulation that occurs in the group of women that will go on to develop type 2 diabetes that is present in the early postpartum period. This suggests there is an underlying problem that exists already and we can detect it.”
In America, 1 in 10 women will develop gestational diabetes during pregnancy. In Australia the figure 1 in 7. This puts these women at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Between 30 to 50% will develop type 2 diabetes within 10 years after delivery.
Women with gestational diabetes are recommended to have an annual oral glucose tolerance test after delivery, which measures the body’s ability to remove glucose from the bloodstream. Fewer than half of all women follow through with it.
“If you’ve got a newborn at home one of the last things you are thinking about or have time for is your own health,” says Wheeler. “This is one of the main reasons why we performed this study, to potentially develop a simple blood test reducing the number of hospital visits.”
About the research
Wheeler and Gunderson first uncovered metabolic signatures predictive of type 2 diabetes in their 2016 SWIFT pilot study of 1033 women. All of the women delivered their babies between 2008 and 2011.
The new study builds on this prior research, following the same cohort of women over a longer time period during which more women developed type 2 diabetes.
Baseline blood samples were collected between six and nine weeks after birth and then twice over two years. The women’s health was followed through their electronic medical records for up to 8 years. During this time, 173 women developed type 2 diabetes and their blood samples were compared to 485 women enrolled in the study, matched for weight, age, race and ethnicity, who had not developed the disease.
“This study is unique as we are not simply comparing healthy people to people with advanced disease,” says Röst, who led the statistical data analysis. “Instead, we are comparing women who are clinically the same–they all had gestational diabetes but are back to living without diabetes after the birth of their child.
“This is the holy grail of personalized medicine to find molecular differences in seemingly healthy people and predict which ones will develop a disease,” says Röst.
Röst said that, unsurprisingly, sugar molecules feature prominently among the identified compounds. But amino-acids and lipid molecules are also present, indicating underlying issues in protein and fat metabolism, respectively. In fact, the predictive power of the test dropped if amino-acids and lipids were excluded, suggesting that processes beyond sugar metabolism may occur very early in the development of the disease. The finding may help explain why complications occur in type 2 diabetes patients even when blood glucose is tightly controlled with medications.
The researchers hope to turn their discovery into a simple blood test that women could take soon after delivery, perhaps during an early visit to the doctor with their baby.
The women from the SWIFT study are being invited back for a 10-year follow-up visit, where they will be tested for type 2 diabetes. “The information we glean from this study will bring us even closer to our goal of developing this blood test,” says Gunderson.
“It will also help us to identify metabolic differences among race and ethnic groups that this test will need to take into account. The test is intended to help obstetricians and primary care providers identify the women with recent gestational diabetes who are most at risk for developing type 2 diabetes and to support them with breastfeeding and other healthful lifestyle habits during the first year postpartum that may reduce their risk.”